GeorgeChevy
Well-known member
sparkyps said:There is nothing "more cost effective" about a lease. You can get very low interest rates on a purchase as well, and your interest rate isn't convoluted to figure out as it is with a lease. The residual value is generally computed conservatively so people who turn in their car at the end of the lease end up losing out on the excess of vehicle value to residual value, that's not cost effective.
I look at total cost of ownership compared to my previous gas vehicle. I was paying around $70-80 a week filling up my car, which is more than what I currently pay to lease my Spark EV plus electricity. Including insurance, it becomes about the same cost, but I get a new car, HOV lane access (the time savings alone for me is worth it), plus that $2500 rebate from CA (and I got the free charger and installation too). I also put less wear and tear on my gas vehicle so maintenance costs are lower. If the leases weren't so low, I wouldn't be driving this car, as I would be paying easily $100 more a month to finance (hence the lease being "more cost effective"). I am driving this car while waiting for new technology, why pay for the whole car when I can just pay for the part I'm using, and be able to just turn it in when I'm done with it?
The US Bank lease is at 1.44% interest. It would be very hard to match that on a finance (0% is usually from the manufacturer, 2.9% is the lowest from GM at the moment), plus you're only paying interest on vehicle depreciation and not the whole vehicle so there is more savings. As for residual value, manufacturers frequently set a artificially high residual to incentivize leases. I have no idea what the car will be worth on the open market at the end of 3 years, but I am OK with the value that they set and would rather lock in my payments versus potentially being upside down on trade-in.
Again, it depends on whether or not you plan to keep the car long-term. I do not, so leasing definitely makes more sense for me.